Home / Group F / Japan
2026 World Cup · Group F

Japan

Team Outlook
Japan are competitive and could snatch second place with their relentless team spirit. Their disciplined pressing and quick transitions are key strengths. However, a lack of a clinical striker limits their scoring. Star playmaker Takefusa Kubo provides creativity from midfield.
Tournament form · DWD
Japan have played 3 matches this tournament: 1W 2D 0L, 7 scored and 3 conceded.
#

Standings

#TeamPWDLGF:GAPts
1Netherlands321010:47
2Japan31207:35
3Sweden31117:74
4Tunisia30032:120
VS

Japan · Group Fixtures

Missed
Group F · Match 11FT 2–2 missed
Netherlands
2-0
Japan
1 75%X 18%2 7%
No significant team news updates; prior prediction stands.
Correct
Group F · Match 36FT 0–4 called
Tunisia
0-1
Japan
1 60%X 25%2 15%
Tunisia opened with a heavy 5-1 defeat to Sweden, exposing critical defensive flaws. Japan's 2-2 draw against the Netherlands, a top side, demonstrated resilience and attacking potency. With Japan technically superior and carrying momentum, they are clear favorites. Tunisia will likely defend deep and seek counters, but their attack looked blunt against Sweden. Japan's quick transitions, orchestrated by Kubo, can unlock Tunisia's backline. A tight, low-scoring contest is expected, with Japan edging it by a single goal. However, Japan's defense showed some vulnerability, leaving room for an upset if Tunisia can capitalize on set-pieces. The draw remains a plausible outcome if Tunisia park the bus effectively.
Exact
Group F · Match 57FT 1–1 exact
Japan
1-1
Sweden
1 30%X 35%2 35%
Japan's 2-2 draw with a strong Netherlands side is a better performance indicator than Sweden's 5-1 demolition of minnows Tunisia. Both teams enter with offensive momentum, but the lack of further squad or form data makes a draw the most calibrated outcome. Sweden may edge possession, yet Japan's proven ability to score against top defenses suggests a tight, balanced contest. 1-1 reflects both teams finding the net, consistent with their opening matches. Confidence is low due to sparse, early-tournament evidence.